Yeshoda Raju, v. A.Kuselan,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.03.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.R.P.(NPD) No.1828 of 2006 & M.P.No.1 of 2006 Yeshoda Raju ... Petitioner/Appellant-Tenant Vs.

A.Kuselan ... Respondent/Respondent-Lands lord Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1993 and Act 1 of 1980 against the fair and decreetal order of the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Uthagamandalam, (Sub ordinate Judge) dated 18.09.2006 made in R.C.A.No.20 of 2006 confirming the order and decreetal order dated 24.03.2006 made in RCOP No.44 of 2000, on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif) at Ooty.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition was earlier listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 20.02.2018 and when the case was called, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and it was also recorded that the petitioner has not taken steps to serve notice on the sole respondent and therefore, the case was posted under the same caption 'for dismissal' today.

2. Today(15.03.2018) when the case was called, at the first instance at about 12:20 p.m., there was no representation on both sides and therefore, the cases were passed over.

3. When the case was called once again at about 1:10 p.m., again there is no representation on both sides. Since https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

there is no appearance on the side of the petitioner, the C.R.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2006 is closed.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VII) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar TO:

1.The Subordinate Judge, Rent Control Appellate Authority, Uthagamandalam, Nilgiris, Ooty.

2.The District Munsif, Ooty.

C.R.P.(NPD) No.1828 of 2006 VGII(CO) NR 17/04/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/