Madras High CourtWP/13864/2020withdrawn dismissed

G.Raja, v. The Member Secretary

2021-02-09Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 9/2/2021 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Writ Petition No.13864 of 2020 a n d M.P.Nos.21786 and 17221 of 2020 G. Raja ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Member Secretary CMDA No.1 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 600 088.

2. The District Collector Collectorate Chengalpattu District.

3. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration Commissionerate of Municipal Administration 78 Urban Administrative Building Santhome High Road Chennai 28.

4. The Tahsildar Tambaram Taluk Chengalpattu District.

5. The Commissioner Tambaram Municipality Tambaram Taluk Chengalpattu District Chennai 600 045.

6. Sundaram

7. Kasthuri.

...

Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 not to give approval to the layout

proposal submitted by the sixth and seventh respondents in Tambaram Town Survey numbers 24/6, 24/7 and 15 Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District in the irrigation area/utilisation of Selaiyur lake.

For petitioner ...

Mr.V.Vargees Amal Raja For respondents ...

Mr.Tamilmani Standing Counsel for R.1.

Mr.Elumalai for R.R.2 to 4 Mr.P.Srinivas for R.5.

Mr.C.Prakasam for R.R.6 to 7.

- - - - - -

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 5 not to give approval to the layout proposal submitted by the sixth and seventh respondents in Tambaram Town Survey numbers 24/6, 24/7 and 15 Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District in the irrigation area/utilisation of Selaiyur lake.

2. Mr.V.Vargees Amal Raja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that pending disposal of the writ petition, respondents have approved the layout and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition, for further adjudication. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No liberty is required as it is always open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mvs.