← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18357/2017disposed of

Kp (Spl), 161, Somangalam v. The Tahsildar,

2017-07-19Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.18357 of 2017 KP (Spl) 161 Somangalam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Rep.by its Secretary S.Thangaraj Somangalam, Chennai-69 ... Petitioner v.

The Tahsildar SriperumbudurTaluk Kancheepuram District ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider within a time frame work the petitioner's representation dated 03.09.2015 seeking Computer patta in its name with respect to property at Somangalam "A" Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District bearing Survey Nos.251/1, comprised in patta No 443, admeasuring to an extent of 3 acres 5 cents.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Magesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Rajeswaran Special Govt. Pleader

O R D E R

Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider their representation dated 03.09.2015 seeking computer patta in its name with respect to property at Somangalam "A" Village, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District bearing Survey Nos.251/1, comprised in patta No 443, measuring an extent of 3 acres 5 cents.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 03.09.2015 seeking for computer patta, the respondent has not issued the same yet.

4. Mr.R.Rajeswaran learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.09.2015 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To The Tahsildar SriperumbudurTaluk Kancheepuram District +1cc to Mr.G.Magesh Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.50712 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.51424 W.P.No.18357 of 2017 CS/24/07/17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/