Sekar v. State Rep By Its

Crl.OP.No.14601 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.14601 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioners apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(i) and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 4 of The Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 1998, in Crime No.189 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, the petitioners along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod, due to which, the defacto complainant sustained multiple injuries. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that due to alleged occurrence, the victim sustained multiple injuries and also got fracture. They got admitted in the hospital and taking treatment in the hospital as In patient. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.14601 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Sma

5. Considering the gravity of the offence committed by the petitioner and also considering that the injured persons are still in hospital, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 24.06.2022 Sma Crl.O.P.No.14601 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis