Kumar @ Anaapanpettai Kumar v. The State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :30.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.15469 of 2020 Kumar @ Annapanpettai Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State represented by, The Inspector of Police, P.E.W.Sirkazhi Police Station, Nagapattinam District.

(Crime, No.710 of 2020).

... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in Crime No.710 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of police, P.E.W.Sirkazhi police Station, Nagapattinam District.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vinoth For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(This Case has been heard through Video Conferencing) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(aaa) and 4(1-A) of TNP Act in Crime No.710 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 400 liters of ID Arrack. Hence, this case has been registered.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner along with other accused were illegally transporting 400 litres of ID Arrack. He further submitted that there are four previous cases pending as against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the nature of offence and bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 30/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, SIRKAZHI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.E.W..SIRKAZHI POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.M.VINOTH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15469/2020 Date :30/09/2020 cs 07/10/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/