P Vignesh v. State Rep By
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN. J., The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 294 (b), 323, 506 (1) and 436 of IPC in Cr.No.111 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with two others blazed the two wheeler of the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent, law abiding citizen and has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to furnish substantial sureties and any conditions to be imposed by this Court for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the petitioner had set the two wheeler of the defacto complainant on fire; abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and attacked the defacto complainant. Hence, he opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his/her/their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to
the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a) if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
(b) the petitioner shall make a non refundable deposit of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) through demand draft to the credit of Crime Number, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;
(c) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(d) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;
(e) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(g) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(h) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
24.05.2023 ab
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN. J., ab 24.05.2023