Mumtaz Alias Sayeeda Begum v. Suraiya Begum

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 10.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Civil Revision Petition No. 2149 of 2022 and Civil Miscellaneous Petition Nos. 11125 & 11128 of 2022 --- 1.Mumtaz Alias Sayeeda Begum W/o. Late. Mohamed Ali Khan 2.M.Imran Khan S/o. Late. Mohamed Ali Khan Both are residing at Vasanth Apartment A-Block, Flat-312, No. 140/154, V.M.Street, Royapettah Chennai- 600 014.

...Petitioners

Versus

1.Suraiya Begum D/o. Mohamed Inayathulla No. 56/64, 2 nd Floor, Ramalingeshwarer Koil Street, Eldams Road, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

2.M.Basheer Ahmed S/o. Late.Mohamed Ali Khan Page No.1-5

Vasanth Apartment, A-Block, Flat - 312, No. 140/154, V.M.Street, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

...Respondents

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records pertaining to D.V.C.No. 17 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, and to strike out the petitioners name and the same as an abuse of the process of law. For Petitioners :

Mr.K.Ezhumalai For R1 :

Mr.K.Moorthy For R2 :

No Appearance ----

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to call for the records pertaining to D.V.C.No. 17 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, and to strike out the petitioners name and the same as an abuse of the process of law.

2.

Mr.K.Ezhumalai, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Moorthy, learned Counsel for the first respondent are present. Page No.2-5

3.

The learned Counsel for the revision petitioners submits that the relief sought for in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case file. Scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:- Page No.3-5

4.

In view of the above submissions made by the learned Counsel for the revision petitioners, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

10.03.2025 MSM To The XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet.

Page No.4-5

R. SAKTHIVEL, J MSM 10.03.2025 Page No.5-5