Venkatachalam v. The Tashildar (Excise)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 27.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1955 of 2004 Venkatachalam .. Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.
1.The Tahsildar (Excise) Ariyalur.
2.Government of Tamilnadu rep by its the District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.
.. Respondents/Defendants Prayer : - Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur made in A.S.No.9 of 1996 dated 18.02.2004 reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Ariyalur made in O.S.No.423 of 1988 dated 30.04.1990.
For the appellant : No appearance For the respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
This matter was listed on 26.04.2018 and on that date, there was no representation for the appellant and the appellant being called and remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the matter on 27.04.2018 under the caption " for dismissal."
2. Today also, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant as well as respondents. Appellant called absent.
3. Resultantly, Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition if any, is closed.
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.
2.The learned Principal District Munsif, Ariyalur. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section High Court Madras ( 2 Copies S.A.No.1955 of 2004 VS (18/05/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/