Madras High CourtCRL OP/13816/2021dismissed

Pazhanimurugan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep.By

2021-08-09Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Ninth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13816 of 2021 PAZHANIMURUGAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU [ RESPONDENT ] REP. BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NELLIKUPPAM POLICE STATION, PANRUTTI TALUK, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

CR.NO.586 OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S. S.ARUNKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested on 20.07.2021 and remanded to judicial custody for the offences under Sections 354-A(1)(i), 376, 511, 294(b) of IPC, in Crime No.586 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and the petitioner are different communities. Further, the petitioner had misbehaved the defacto complainant and pushed her and try to sexual assault on her. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner has been in jail from 20.07.2021. He further submits that the petitioner filed a bail application in CMP.No.586 of 2021 and the same was dismissed on 30.07.2021 before the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore. Therefore, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner had misbehaved the defacto complainant and pushed her. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the defacto complainant grazing the cattle in her land, at that time, the petitioner had misbehaved and pushed her and try to sexual assault on her, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 09/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NELLIKUPPAM POLICE STATION, PANRUTTI TALUK, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

2 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, VEDAMPATTU DISTRICT PRISON, VILLUPURAM TALUK AND DISTRICT.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. S.ARUNKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13816/2021 Date :09/08/2021 INBA 17/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/