← Library
Madras High CourtWA/861/2009closed

The Chief Educational Officer v. S.Usha

2016-08-10Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10..08..2016 C O R A M The Hon'ble Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.MAHADEVAN Writ Appeal No.861 of 2009 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Karur.

2.The District Educational Officer, Karur.

3.The Director of School Education College Road, Chennai 600 006 ... Appellants / Respondents

Versus

S.Usha ... Respondent/Petitioner Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30.03.2009 made in W.P.No.19935 of 2007.

Petition praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proc. O Mu.No 1368/A1/99 dated 19.3.1999 and quash the same and direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to join service as per the appointment order of the second respondent in Na.Ka. 4417/A1/98 dated 4.1.99 with all monetary and service benefits . For Appellants : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan Special Government.

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Honourable The Chief Justice) We have heard the learned counsel for the Appellants. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. It is pointed out that a common order has been passed disposing of two writ petitions on 30.03.2009, being W.P.Nos.38507 of 2006 and 19935 of 2007, both by the same original petitioner. Apparently, two appeals were filed separately. The present appeal is against the order in W.P.No.19935 of 2007. In respect of W.P.No.38507 of 2006, Writ Appeal No.9102 of 2009 is stated to have been filed, which was dismissed on 05.10.2010 with a direction to the appellants to comply with the directions in the impugned order.

3. The matter being one of compassionate appointment, and there being common order qua the same person (the reliefs are linked, though worded differently assailing the same order), this appeal must also necessarily fail and is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

4.Interim order stand vacated.

5. We may however note that as per learned Special Government Pleader on instructions, the respondent is stated not to have approached the department over this period of time. Copy of the order be sent to the respondent through court process without batta.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To S.Usha D/OV.Singaravelu(Late), No.13, Mariamman Koil Street, Manachanallur (Post) Trichy District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.45803 W.A. No.861 of 2009 pa[co] srg 30/08/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/