← Library
Madras High CourtWP/16741/2021disposed of

K.Chakravarthy, v. The Managing Director

2021-08-17Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN W.P.NO.16741 OF 2021 [Video Conferencing] K.Chakravarthy ... Petitioner .Vs.

1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Vazhuthareddy, Villupuram - 605602.

2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Vellore Region, Vellore - 632 009.

3. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme, Thiruvalluvar House, PallavanSalai, Chennai - 600002.

... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the Differential of Gratuity, Commutation, Leave Salary amount and RBS pension along with interest at the rate of 18% within the stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. For Petitioner :

Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondents :

Mr.C.S.K.Sathish (TNSTC), Villupuram.

ORDER

1. With the consent of both parties, the Writ Petition was taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, learned counsel for Transport Corporation, Villupuram District take notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein, who retired from the services of the Respondents Corporation on reaching the age of superannuation, have come up with the above Writ Petition, seeking a direction to the respondents to settle the Differential of Gratuity, Commutation, Leave Salary amount and RBS pension along with interest at the rate of 18% within the time frame.

3. This Court heard the submission of the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

4. It is well settled in very many cases that the employee is entitled to interest for the belated payment of his retiral benefits. A Division Bench of this Court in Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department vs. M.Deivasigamani [2009 (3) MLJ 01] has held that the employee is entitled to interest on belated payment of pension and other retiral benefits, even in the absence of statutory rules/ administrative instructions or guidelines and that he can claim interest under Part III of the Constitution, relying on Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

5. In a similar circumstance, the First Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 on 12.06.2015, directed the respondent/Transport Corporation to settle the terminal benefits of its employees in equal monthly instalments and to pay 6% interest on the terminal benefits payable to the workman. It has also held that the workman is entitled to 18% interest for the defaulted period of instalments.

6. Following the above judgements, a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.15886 of 2020 on 19.01.2021, directed the respondent/Transport Corporation to pay interest @ 6% per annum, for the belated payment of gratuity and other retiral benefits.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of delay, this Court is inclined to grant interest @ 4% per annum, for the belated payment of retirement benefits along with differential of Gratuity, Commutation, Leave Salary amount and RBS pension, that are yet to be settled, in four equal monthly instalments, commencing from 01.10.2021. In case of delay in making instalments within

the time stipulated supra, the interest payable could be 10% for the delayed period to be recovered from the Officer responsible for disbursement of the amount.

8. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to pay interest would not preclude the petitioner/workman to question the computation of any of the terminal benefits, if the same is paid lesser than the amount to which, he is entitled to receive. Likewise, if the petitioner has any grievance that he is entitled to interest for the amount already settled, he can agitate the same as per law, if he is entitled.

9. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations and directions. No costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssi To 1.

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Vazhuthareddy, Villupuram - 605602.

2.

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Vellore Region, Vellore - 632 009.

3.

The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme, Thiruvalluvar House, PallavanSalai, Chennai - 600002.

+1cc to Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, Advocate, S.R.No.41435 +1cc to Mr.J.Pradeep, Advocate, S.R.No.41158 W.P.NO.16741 OF 2021 GPL(CO) PBS/13/09/2021