Suri Srinivas v. N.Vijayalakshmi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 30.08.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD).No.2348 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.12109 of 2016 Suri Srivilas Proprietor "Books Paradise", New No.5 & 7, Raghavaiah Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

... Petitioner Vs.

N.Vijayalakshmi rep by her Power Agent N.Parthasarathy ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960, as amended by Act 23 of 1973 and Act 1 of 1980 against the order and decreetal order dated 02.12.2013 made in R.C.A.No.122 of 2013 on the file of the VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai (Appellate Authority) confirming the order and decreetal order dated 22.02.2013 made in R.C.O.P.No.1558 of 2011 on the file of the XIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, (Rent Control Jurisdiction), Chennai. Petitioner : Suri Srivilas - no appearance

O R D E R

When the matter was listed for hearing on 12.08.2016, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that they have handed over the papers to the petitioner and also gave change of vakalat for engaging some other counsel. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, Registry was directed to issue drafted notice to the petitioner. Pursuant to the order dated 12.08.2016, Registry sent a drafted notice to the petitioner, however, the same was returned unserved with an endorsement that the petitioner had vacated the premises. Hence, the matter was listed on 26.08.2016 and on 26.08.2016, the matter was adjourned to 29.08.2016 directing the Registry to print the name of the petitioner. When the matter was listed on 29.08.2016, though the name of the petitioner was printed in the cause list, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to today (i.e) 30.08.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution.

2.Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index : No 30.08.2016 Internet : Yes va

To 1.The VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, (Appellate Authority), Chennai.

2.The XIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, (Rent Control Jurisdiction), Chennai.

M.DURAISWAMY,J.

va C.R.P.(NPD).No.2348 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.12109 of 2016 30.08.2016