← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl./1060/2026closed

Chandiran v. The Deputy Inspector General Of Prisons

2026-06-05Honourable Dr.Justice Anita Sumanth,Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Chandiran S/o. Pellakki Kavudar (Late), No.14/15, B-1, Thenodu Village, Bengal Mattam Post, Nilgiri District - 643 204.

..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

2. The Superintendent of Prisons Central Prison, Coimbatore.

..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in the order No.85/mu.uu/2025 dated 04-02-2026 passed by respondent No.1 and quashing the same, and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave 30 days by without escort for the petitioners son namely Sridhar @ Babu S/o. Chandiran, aged about 47 years, Pid No. 243862, Convict Prisoner, Central Prison, Coimbatore and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

Ms.S.Nadhiya For Respondent(s):

Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, Counsel For Government Of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) We have heard Ms.Nadhiya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, learned counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for the respondents.

2. The challenge is to order of rejection of Ordinary Leave of 30 days without escort. The reasons assigned is that the convict had not completed one year mandatory period as per the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 after completion of the earlier leave.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the date of order is 04.02.2026 when in fact the convict had completed one year. This is factually incorrect. The period of one year had only been completed in April 2026 and hence as on date, the convict is eligible to apply leave. Hence the convict being at liberty, may apply to the authorities and application if made will be considered in accordance with extant rules and regulations.

4. With this, this habeas corpus petition is closed. No costs. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No ssm

To

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

2. The Superintendent of Prisons Central Prison, Coimbatore.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

DR.ANITA SUMANTH J.

AND SUNDER MOHAN J.

ssm 05-06-2026