Mannangatti@Madhvan S/O.Chakkr v. Radha W/O.Velayutham Piathampa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:06.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1971 of 2004 Mannangatti @ Madhavan ... Appellant/Defendant/Respondent Vs.

1.Radha 2.Kumar 3.Sundararajan 4.Jayamurthi 5.Gangeswari 6.Kannapiran ... Respondents/Plaintiff/Appellant Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 08.07.2004 passed in A.S.No.23 of 2003 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Panruti reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.09.2003 passed in O.S.No.307 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif of Panruti.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesalu for M/s.Usha Raman

J U D G M E N T

Counsel for the respondents present.

2. No representation for the appellant, despite the matter being called twice. As seen from the notes paper, it is found that repeatedly the matter had been adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel. Despite the same, the counsel for the appellant has not evinced interest to make submissions. In https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

such view of the matter, there is no purpose in keeping the Second Appeal further pending. Appellant called absent. 3.In the light of the above position, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Subordinate Court, Panruti.

2.The District Munsif, District Munsif Court, Panruti.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai. (2 copies) S.A.No.1971 of 2004 ssv(CO) TR(19/07/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/