← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/14787/2022granted

D.Suman v. The State Rep By Its,

2022-06-29Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Ninth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.14787 of 2022 1 D.SUMAN [ PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED ] 2 S.MAGESH Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADYAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CR.NO.109 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.V.C.VINOTH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.DAMODARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor For Intervenor : MR.R.RAVICHANDRAN,Advocate Assist by MR.M.V.VIJAYAKUMAR,Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 294 (b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No. 109 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute, the petitioners went to the house of the defacto complainant and abused the defacto complainant and attacked with hands and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. He would further submit that the injured has been treated as OutPatient. He further submitted that there are no previous case pending as against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai-15, on condition that the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall stay at Ulundurpet and report before the Ulundurpet Town police station twice daily at 10.30 a.m., and 5.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 29/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE IX METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-15.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADYAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, ULUNDURPET TOWN POLICE STATION, ULUNDURPET.

+1CC to M/S.V.C.VINOTH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.10278 CRL OP.14787/2022 Date :29/06/2022 CSK 30/06/2022