← Library
Madras High CourtWP/16138/2024dismissed

C.Malarvizhi v. The District Collector

2024-06-21Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.06.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.Malarvizhi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector Collectorate, Tiruppur District.

2.The General Manager SIDCO, Corporate Office Chennai 32.

3.The Branch Manager SIDCO, Branch Office SIDCO Industrial Estate Coimbatore 641 021.

4.The Chief Executive Officer 5.The Branch Manager

Vellakoil Branch, No.716-E Erode Road 6.Lakshmi Industrial Equipments rep.by Mr.Subburaj No.22/10, Kollan Thottam, Nallampalayam, Coimbatore District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to appoint a Fit Person and to conduct enquiry from the Consultative Committee for Banking Development, Tiruppur District and fixing the time frame by this Court in view of the petitioner's representation dated 02.05.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Naresh Kumar For R1 : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan,AGP

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,] (1)Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent.

(2)The present writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to appoint a Fit Person and to conduct enquiry from the Consultative Committee for Banking Development, Tiruppur District by considering the petitioner's

representation dated 02.05.2024.

(3)The petitioner, on the basis of his representation, has filed the present writ petition. A mandamus can be issued only to enforce a statutory obligation against an authority. In this case, the petitioner has neither indicated any statutory obligation nor the right based on any statute or principle. The writ petition, therefore cannot be entertained. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed.

(4)However, this Court has not gone into the merits of the contentions of the petitioner in this writ petition as she has made serious allegations against the officials of the Bank. It is open to the petitioner to approach any other Forum which can go into the complaint as against the respondent / Bank and can also initiate criminal prosecution as against the Bank if she is able to prove the allegations made against the respondent / Bank or any officials of the respondent / Bank.

[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.] 21.06.2024 AP Internet : Yes

To 1.The District Collector Collectorate, Tiruppur District.

2.The General Manager SIDCO, Corporate Office Chennai 32.

3.The Branch Manager SIDCO, Branch Office SIDCO Industrial Estate Coimbatore 641 021.

4.The Chief Executive Officer 5.The Branch Manager Vellakoil Branch, No.716-E Erode Road

S.S. SUNDAR, J., and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J., AP 21.06.2024