← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/18083/2016allowed

V.Mohan, Aged 56 Years v. State By

2016-08-19Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.08.2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P. Nos.18083 & 18084 of 2016 V. Mohan

...Petitioner in Crl.OP.18083 of 2016

R. Ramesh

...Petitioner in Crl.OP.18084 of 2016

Vs 1.

State by:

Inspector of Police Chennai Central Railway Police Station Chennai (Crime No.133 of 2016) R. Ramesh

...Respondents in Crl.OP.18083 of 2016

1.

State by:

Inspector of Police Chennai Central Railway Police Station Chennai (Crime No.134 of 2016)

2. V. Mohan

...Respondents in Crl.OP.18084 of 2016

Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the First Information Report in Crime Nos.133 and 134 of 2016 respectively, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Chennai Central Railway Police, Chennai, as against the petitioners.

For petitioner in Crl.O.P. No.18083 of 2016 & : Mr. K.R. Ramesh Kumar R2 in Crl.O.P.No.18084/2016 For petitioner in Crl.O.P. No.18084 of 2016 & : Mr. R. Raghu Raj R2 in Crl.O.P. 18083 of 2016 For R1 in both the : Mr. C. Emalias Crl.O.Ps.

Additional Public Prosecutor

COMMON ORDER These Criminal Original Petitions are filed seeking to call for the records and quash the First Information Report in Crime Nos.133 and 134 of 2016 respectively on the file of the Inspector of Police, Chennai Central Railway Police, Chennai, as against the petitioners.

For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their name.

3.

On the complaint lodged by Ramesh, the first respondent police registered a case in Crime No.133 of 2016 for offences under Sections 323 and 294(b), IPC read with Section 3(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, against Mohan. 4.

Likewise, on the complaint lodged by Mohan, the first respondent police registered a case in Crime No.134 of 2016 for offences under Sections 341 and 323, IPC against Ramesh.

5.

Ramesh and Mohan are before this Court to quash both the FIRs on the ground that they have arrived at a compromise. 6.

Today, both Ramesh and Mohan are present before this Court and are identified by Mr. Ravi, Sub-Inspector of Police, Chennai Central Railway Police Station, who is also present before this Court.

7.

Ramesh and Mohan have filed independent affidavits, wherein, they have stated that they both are employed in Railways and they had quarrelled over some petty issue and now, they have settled the issue between themselves and have prayed for quashment of the two FIRs.

In view of the above, FIRs in Crime Nos.133 and 134 of 2016 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Chennai, are quashed and both the Criminal Original Petitions are allowed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cad

To 1.

The Inspector of Police Chennai Central Railway Police Station Chennai The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104.

+1cc to Mr.R. Raghu Raj, Advocate, S.R.No.47796 +1cc to Mr.K.R. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.47795 Crl.O.P. Nos.18083 and 18084 of 2016 CTK(CO) CA(08/09/2016)