1.Padmavathi (All Are Res.At v. 1.R.Subramanian,S/O.Ramasami,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.10.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1093 of 2001

1. Padmavathi

2. P.Murali Kumar ... Appellants Vs.

1. R.Subramanian

2. S.Krishnaveni

...Respondents

Prayer: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 23.03.2000 passed by the Learned V Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Madras in A.S.No.165/99 confirming the Judgment dated 25.03.1998 on the file of the IV Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, made in O.S.No.11686 of 1992.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

When the second appeal was listed for hearing on 13.10.2017, there was no representation on both sides on that day and hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal".

2. Even though, the matter is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on both sides. The Appellants are called absent. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The V Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai

2. The IV Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai 3.The Section Officer VR Section High Court, Madras S.A.No.1093 of 2001 ss(co) aa20/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/