Dr. B. Mani v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.28758 of 2017 Dr.B.Mani BMR Nursing HOme 1171, Chennai Salai Panruti, Cuddalore District.

... Petitioner vs.

The Tahsildar Panruti, Panruti Taluk Cuddalore Taluk.

...Respondent

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 27.07.2017 seeking transfer of Patta, peruse necessary records, conduct enquiry and pass orders on merits.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.D.Rafi For Respondent : Mr.E.Balamurugan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the respondent to consider his representation dated 27.07.2017, wherein and whereby he sought for transferring Patta in his favour.

4. The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that his request was not considered by the respondent so far. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the respondent to consider https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and decide the same. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.07.2017 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the rival claimants, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mk To The Tahsildar Panruti, Panruti Taluk Cuddalore Taluk.

W.P.No.28758 of 2017 aa27/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/