Madras High CourtCRL OP/3935/2015allowed

The Inspector Of Police, v. Dinesh Neelkanth Sathe,

2015-07-29Honourable Mr Justice B. Rajendran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.7.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Crl.OP.Nos.3935 to 3937 of 2015 18884 and 18885 of 2015 The Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch EDF - III, Egmore, Chennai - 8 ... Petitioner in Crl.R.C.Nos.3935 to 3937/ 2015/ 2nd Respondent in Crl.R.C.Nos.18884/15 and 18885/15 M/s. Amman Try Sponge and Power (P)Ltd Rep.by General Manager K.Chandrasekaran, No.46, Usman Ali Street TVS Tollgate, Trichy - 620 020 ... Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.18884/15 and 18885/15 Vs.

Dinesh Neelkanth Sathe ... Respondent in Crl.OP.No.3935/15 and 1st respondent in Crl.OP.No.18885/15 Seetha Raman ... Respondent in Crl.OP.No.3936/15 Prajakta Sathe ... Respondent in Crl.OP.No.3937/15 and 1st respondent in Crl.OP.No.18884/15 Petitions filed under Section 439-IB of Cr.P.C. to cancel the Anticipatory bail granted to the respondent/accused in Crl.OP.Nos.12994 of 2013, 12944 of 2013, 13981 of 2013 and 12948 of 2013 dated 31.07.2013.

For Petitioner in :

Mr.V.Arul Crl.OP.Nos.3935 to 3937/15 Government Advocate and for 2nd respondent in Crl.OP.Nos 18884 and 18885 of 2015 For petitioner in Crl.OP.Nos 18884 and 18885 of 2015 :

Mr.K.Bijai Sundar For Respondent in Crl.OP.Nos.3935 to 3937 :

Mr. P.Jesus Moris Ravi

COMMON ORDER Both the defacto complainant as well as the State have preferred the above Criminal Original Petitions to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the accused Nos.1,2 and 5.

2. Today, when the matters were taken up for consideration, it is represented by both sides that the fifth accused (Crl.OP.No.3936 of 2015) has complied with the conditions imposed by this Court.

3. Recording the said submission, the Crl.OP.No.3936 of 2015 filed by the prosecution to cancel the Anticipatory Bail granted to the fifth accused is dismissed.

4. Insofar as the accused Nos.1 and 2 are concerned, the prosecution has filed Crl.OP.Nos.3935 of 2015 and 3937 of 2015 and the defacto complainant has filed Crl.OP.Nos.18884 and 18885 of 2015 to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to them and now it is represented that the accused Nos.1 and 2 are not complying with the conditions imposed by this Court .

5. It is needless to point out that if the accused fails to comply with the conditions imposed by this Court while granting anticipatory bail, automatically the bail granted to them has to be cancelled. Since, in these cases, the accused 1 and 2 have not complied with the conditions for more than two years, the anticipatory bail granted to the accused Nos 1 and 2 are cancelled.

6. Accordingly, the Crl.OP.Nos.3935 of 2015, 3927 of 2015, 18884 of 2015 and 18885 of 2015 are allowed. The Police is directed to take necessary steps to arrest the accused Nos.1 and 2. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ga To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee.

2.The Officer Incharge, Tirunelveli Town Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras +2cc's to M/s.K.Bijai Sundar, Advocate, S.R.No.38825 & 38826 Crl.OP.Nos.3935 to 3937 of 2015 and 18884 and 18885 of 2015 GP(CO) CA(19/08/2015)