← Library
Madras High CourtWA/676/2021dismissed

A.Venkatesan v. The State Of Information Commissioner

2024-07-04Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.07.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN A.Venkatesan ... Appellant Vs.

1.

The State Information Commissioner, Tamilnadu Information Commission, No.2, Sir Thiyagarayar Road, Eldams Road Junction, Theynampet, Chennai - 18.04.2017 The Superintendent of Police/Appellate Authority, The Public Information Officer / Additional Superintendent of Police, Police Head Office, 4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet Sub Division, 5.

The Inspector of Police, Page No.1 of 5

Thali Police Station, 6.

The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Amman Complex, Erode - 11.

... Respondents Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 01.06.2020 passed in W.P.No.10230 of 2019. For Appellant : Mr.M.Karthik For R1 : Mr.C.Vigneswaran For R2 to R5 : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran Special Government Pleader For R6 : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The grievances of the appellant is that the documents sought for from the Police Department for the purpose of conducting investigation of an accident has not been furnished.

The appellant, admittedly, was engaged as an Investigator by the Page No.2 of 5

New India Assurance Company Limited. The appellant performs his job with reference to the terms agreed between the Insurance company and himself. The documents as such sought for from the Police Department relating to an accident become unnecessary, in view of the fact that the Police Department is uploading the detailed accident report in their Official website, which is made available to the parties including the Insurance company. That being so, the findings of the learned Single Judge is in consonance with the procedures to be adopted under the Motor Vehicles Act. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No order as to costs. [S.M.S., J.] [C.K., J.] 04.07.2024 Index :

Yes/No Speaking Order :

Yes/No :

Yes/No veda To 1.

The State Information Commissioner, Page No.3 of 5

Tamilnadu Information Commission, No.2, Sir Thiyagarayar Road, Eldams Road Junction, Theynampet, Chennai - 18.04.2017 The Superintendent of Police/Appellate Authority, The Public Information Officer / Additional Superintendent of Police, Police Head Office, 4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet Sub Division, 5.

The Inspector of Police, Thali Police Station, 6.

The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Amman Complex, Erode - 11.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

Page No.4 of 5

veda Judgment in 04.07.2024 Page No.5 of 5