Kousalya v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.10.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH W.P.No.32302 of 2015 Kousalya Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police, Upplipalayam, Coimbatore.

Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation given by the petitioner dated 27.08.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.Devaraj Mahesh For Respondent : Mr.Mohammed Riyaz Government Advocate (crl.side)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation given by the petitioner dated 27.08.2015.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent.

3. It is seen that the petitioner's husband had taken vehicle loan from a bank and it is alleged by the petitioner that the officers of the bank are harassing her husband for repayment of the loan. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation dated 27.08.2015 to the Commissioner of Police requesting that her husband should not be harassed. In the considered opinion of this Court, a mandamus to the Commissioner of police to dispose of such a representation cannot be issued as there is no statutory duty on the Commissioner of Police to dispose of the representation of this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

nature. Hence, this writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar sms To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Upplipalayam, Coimbatore.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.Devaraj Advocate sr.58140 W.P.No.32302 of 2015 aa17/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/