V.P.Radhakrishnan, v. The Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.11.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.4978 of 2013 1.V.P.Radhakrishnan 2.V.Arikrishnan 3.M.Thirumeni 4.R.Venkatasamy 5.M.Vaithilingam ... Petitioners

Versus

1.The Commissioner H.R.& C.E. Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

2.The Joint Commissioner H.R.&C.E. Department, Cuddalore District.

... Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Respondents, particularly the 1st Respondent's order dated 18.12.2012 passed in A.P.No.74/2011/D2 and quash the same and consequently give the relief as sought in the Original Application in O.A.No.4/2010, order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 26.7.2011.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Prathap Singh Government Advocate (HR&CE)

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 29.11.2016. Even today, (i.e. 29.11.2016), https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rm To 1.The Commissioner H.R.& C.E. Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

2.The Joint Commissioner H.R.&C.E. Department, Cuddalore District.

+1cc to Government Pleader Sr.70486 W.P.No.4978 of 2013 ak[co] srg 10/01/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/