C.Venkatesappa v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.03.2015

CORAM

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan Crl.O.P.No.4130 of 2015 C.Venkatesappa

...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant

vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

Respondents/complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to direct the respondent, viz., the Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Krishnagiri District, to register a case on the petitioner's complaint, dated 18.10.2014, sent to the respondents by RPAD.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Arulraj For Respondents: Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondentPolice. 2.

Considering the allegations made in the complaint and in view of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others reported in [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)] which has to be followed in letter and spirit viz., that if a cognizable offence is made out, the respondent-Police is duty bound to register a case, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

by directing the first respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 18.10.2014, and investigate the same in accordance with law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar Dated:13.3.15 True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.T.Arulraj, Advocate,SR.12750.

sai(co) krd 19/3 Crl.O.P.No.4130 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/