Kalaiselvan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM Crl.O.P.No.4969 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Kalaiselvan S/o.Ramachandran ..Petitioner Vs.

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Chidambaram.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by Inspector of Police, Orathoor Police Station, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District.

..Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order of Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Chidambaram, passed in M.C.No.22 of 2013 on 18.02.2013 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Manikandan For Respondents: Mr.B.Ramesh Babu, Government Advocate [Crl.side]

O R D E R

Petitioner seeks quash of proceedings in M.C.No.22 of 2013 on the file of Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Chidambaram, dated 18.02.2013.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate [Crl.side].

3. The proceedings under challenge is one requiring the petitioner to show cause against requiring him to execute a bond for a period of one year. The proceedings under challenge https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

relates to the year 2013 and hence, the matter has become infructuous.

The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar gm To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Chidambaram.

2. The Inspector of Police, Orathoor Police Station, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.4969 of 2013 SKS(CO) sp/3/7 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/