← Library
Madras High CourtA/2283/2020dismissed as infructuous

M.Aslam Khan, S/O. Mohideen Rafiq, v. B.Anil Kumar Alias Anil Kumar S Mehta And 4 Others

2020-12-17Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR A. No.2283 of 2020 in C.S. No.256 of 2020 M.Aslam Khan, S/o.Mohideen Rafiq, No.151/64, Portuguese Church Road, Seven Wells, Chennai 600 001.

... Plaintiff -VersusB.Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar S.Mehta, No.110, Atkinson Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

... Defendant A.No.2283 of 2020:

M.Aslam Khan, S/o.Mohideen Rafiq, No.151/64, Portuguese Church Road, Seven Wells, Chennai 600 001.

...Applicant/Plaintiff -Versus1.B.Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar S.Mehta, No.110, Atkinson Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

...1st Respondent/Defendant

2.The District Collector, Thiruvallur.

3.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

4.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, CMDA Branch, Thalamuthu Natarajar Maligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

5.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Sowcarpet Branch, No.143, N.S.C.Bose Road, Sowacarpet, Chennai.

..Respondents 2 to 5/Garnishees Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant Proorder prohibiting the respondents 2 to 5/Garnishees from disbursing the amount to the extent of Rs.6,95,92,896/- lying with the Garnishees to the first respondent pending disposal pending disposal of the above suit. This application coming on this day before this court for hearing, the Court made the following order:

Instant application has been filed to grant pro-order prohibiting the respondents 2 to 5/Garnishees from disbursing the amount to the extent of Rs.6,95,92,896/- lying with the garnishees to the first respondent pending disposal of the suit.

2. Heard Ms.AL.Ganthimathi, learned counsel for the applicant.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that money is already withdrawn. Hence this application does not survive. Submission of the learned counsel is recorded.

4. Accordingly, instant application is dismissed as infructuous, without prejudice to the right of the applicant. Sd./-N.S.K.J 17.12.2020 //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. JJ 04/01/2021