K.Ragupathy @ Ragu v. State Rep By
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(aaa) and 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 and under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC, in Crime No. 63 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in possession of 2880 bottles of brandy each containing 180 ml and different brand labels with different marking summing to 110 litres of illicit liquor mixed with poisonous substances. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner was in possession of 110 litres of ID arrack. He further submits that there are two accused and the petitioner is A2 and he has no previous case pending against him. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the PUDUCHERRY ADVOCATE WELFARE FUND, A/c. No.7199772117; IFSC No.IDIB000B173, and on such deposit the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedaranyam on condition that the petitioner shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties
each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the PUDUCHERRY ADVOCATE WELFARE FUND, A/c. No.7199772117; IFSC No.IDIB000B173, and the receipt of such deposit shall be produced before the concerned learned Magistrate at the time of execution of bond.
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
04.07.2022 drl
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
drl 04.07.2022