← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17199/2021closed

Kabilan v. The Director

2021-09-27Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.09.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.17199 of 2021 Kabilan ....

Petitioner -Vs1. The Director Directorate of Town and Country Planning 2nd and 3rd Floor, C and E Market Road Koyambedu, Chennai 600 017.

2. G.Gajendran (Impleaded vide Court order dated 27.09.2021 in WMP No.22152 of 2021)in WP.17199/2021 .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 07.07.2021 for revocation of temporary suspension on DTCP layout approval No.903/2018, dated 17.10.2018 for lands in Survey Nos.2B/1A, 1C, 2, 3A Part, 3c Part, 3E, 4A Park, 4C Part, 4D, 6A1, 6A2 part, 7 part, 9 Part and 19 Part of Nallambakkam Village, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpattu within a timeframe that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.V.Chandrasekaran For Respondents :

Mr.A.Selvendran, Government Advocate - for R1

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent submitted that, the first respondent through proceedings dated 25.09.2021 has passed an order by revoking the temporary suspension of the D.T.C.P. approval and in view of this development, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.

2. The learned counsel for the impleaded respondent submitted that the proceedings of the first respondent was made https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

without considering the objections / representation made by the impleaded respondent and without considering the pending proceedings.

3. In the considered view of this Court, this Court is not going into the validity or otherwise of the proceedings of the first respondent dated 25.09.2021 and this Court is merely recording the proceedings and closing the writ petition. If the impleaded respondent is aggrieved by the same, it is left open to him to challenge the same in the manner known to law. This writ petition is closed accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar KST To The Director Directorate of Town and Country Planning 2nd and 3rd Floor, C and E Market Road Koyambedu, Chennai 600 017.

+1cc to Mr.P.C.Hari Kumar & Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.49844 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.50125 W.P.No.17199 of 2021 PL(CO) SB(29/11/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/