Karunagaran v. The State Rep By , The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Karunagaran ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Muthandikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

(Crime No.39 of 2025).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.39 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kasirajan For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.39 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 194(3) @ 108 and 85 of BNS.

1/5

2. The case of the prosecution is that, the deceased is the wife of the petitioner; that she had delivered a pre-mature baby, due to which, there was a quarrel between the deceased and the petitioner; that the petitioner had demanded more dowry; and that frustrated over the same, deceased had committed suicide. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the allegations are false; that the petitioner is in custody from 14.03.2025 and further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the RDO Enquiry has been conducted.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

2/5

6. Considering, the nature of allegation; the period of incarceration; and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panruti and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the 3/5

conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

29.04.2025 Sma To

1. Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panruti.

2.The Inspector of Police, Muthandikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

Sma 29.04.2025 5/5