K.Pandivelu v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :17.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P. Nos.33105 to 33110 of 2015 & M.P.Nos.1,1,1,1,1 and 1 of 2015 & W.M.P.Nos.33206 to 33211 of 2016 1.K.Pandivelu .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33105 of 2015 2.D.Haridoss .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33106 of 2015 3.V.Kumaran .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33107 of 2015 4.K.Karunakaran .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33108 of 2015 5.M.Kodhandan .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33109 of 2015 6.S.Solai Suresh Babu .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33110 of 2015 Vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai -7.

2.The Additional Commissioner of Police, (Traffic) Office of the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai -7.

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Armed Reserve, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai -8.

.. Respondents in all WPs COMMON PRAYER : Petitions filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the proceedings of the Third Respondent issued in P.R./Traffic/P.R.(56)/2015 approved on 11.06.2015, P.R. / Traffic/ P.R.(78)/2015 signed on 14.03.2015, P.R. / Traffic / P.R.(67)/2015 approved on 11.06.2015, P.R./ Traffic / P.R.(58) / 2015 approved on 11.06.2015, P.R. /Traffic / P.R.(63)/ 2015 signed on 14.03.2015, P.R. / Traffic / P.R.(73) / 2015 approved on 11.06.2015, respectively under Rule 3(b) of Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 and Quash the same with the consequential Direction, directing the respondents to consider the name of the Petitioners, for further Promotion to the post of Inspector of Police. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ravikumar (In all WPs) For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhananjayan (In all WPs) Special Government Pleader C O M M O N O R D E R The writ petitions have been listed under the caption "for withdrawal" on the basis of the letter dated 14.07.2017 given by the learned counsel for the writ petitioners before the Registry.

2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioners sought to withdraw these writ petitions and also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording his submission and the endorsement, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CO) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar maya To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai -7.

2.The Additional Commissioner of Police, (Traffic) Office of the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai -7.

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Armed Reserve, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai -8.

+1cc to Mr.V.Ravikumar,Advocate sr.49842 +1cc to the Government Pleader sr.50106 W.P. Nos.33105 to 33110/2015 nrI(co) ss(31/7/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/