← Library
Madras High CourtWP/31198/2012dismissed as infructuous

M/S.Nemat Engineering Pvt. v. The Director Generation

2015-08-12Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.8.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.31198 of 2012 M/S.NEMAT ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.

REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR JUZER. A.RAGIB NO.15 VANNIER STREET CHENNAI-600 001 [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE DIRECTOR GENERATION TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD (TANGEDCO) 144 ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2 2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER MECHANICAL THERMAL STATION (MTS) TANGEDCO 144, ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2 3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION METTUR DAM 636 406 4 THE CHIEF ENGINEER NORTH CHENNAI THERMAL POWER STATION CHENNAI- 600 120 5 THE CHIEF ENGINEER ENNORE THERMAL POWER STATION ENNORE CHENNAI-57 6 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER THERMAL PURCHASE TANGEDCO 144, ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2 7 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/M.II METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION METTUR DAM 636 406

8 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/M.II NCTPS, CHENNAI-600 120 [ RESPONDENTS ] This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1, 2 & 6 to either consider the Competitive and Eligible Tender Bid of the petitioner in Technical and Commercial bid along with other applicants as per law in a fair and transparent manner with regard to the impugned tender in Tender Specification No. CE/M/TS/OT.NO.07/2012-13 dated 16.8.2012 for supply of PSC Sleepers for Railway Track Lines to Thermal Stations (MTPS, ETPS and NCTPS). For petitioner : Mr.M.Babu Barveez for Profexs Associates For respondents : Mr.G.Vasudevan TNEB

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if the respondents pursue the matter based on the impugned tender specification, dated 16.8.2012. He had also made an endorsement to that effect.

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if the respondents are proceeding further, based on the impugned tender specification, dated 16.8.2012. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2013 is closed. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar lan To:

1 THE DIRECTOR GENERATION TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD (TANGEDCO) 144 ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2

2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER MECHANICAL THERMAL STATION (MTS) TANGEDCO 144, ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2 3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION METTUR DAM 636 406 4 THE CHIEF ENGINEER NORTH CHENNAI THERMAL POWER STATION CHENNAI- 600 120 5 THE CHIEF ENGINEER ENNORE THERMAL POWER STATION ENNORE CHENNAI-57 6 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER THERMAL PURCHASE TANGEDCO 144, ANNA SALAI CHENNAI-2 7 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/M.II METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION METTUR DAM 636 406 8 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/M.II NCTPS, CHENNAI-600 120 +1 cc to M/s.Profexs Associates Advocate sr.42254 +1 cc to Mr.P.Gunaraj Advocate sr.42376 Writ Petition No.31198 of 2012 bvr(co) aa03/09/2015