Madras High CourtCS/234/2010dismissed as infructuous

Ms.Meena Sakthivel v. M/S.Mahatma Marketin

2017-01-31Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:

31.01.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN CS.No.234 of 2010

1. Meena Sakthivel

2. Sylvester Rajaratnam

3. V.Krishnamoorthy, Managing Director M/s.J.K.Visiontree Private Limited Plaintiffs Vs

1. M/s.Mahatma Marketin, by its Managing Director S.Srinivasan, Chennai-6

2. M/s.Gemini Colour Laboratory Chennai-92 Defendants Prayer:- This Civil Suit is filed under Order XLII Rule 1, 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC read with Sections 55 to 62 of the Copy Right Act, 1956, for the reliefs as stated therein. For Plaintiffs :

Mr.A.Chidambaram For Defendants :

Mr.S.Sundar JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the Plaintiff has submitted that this suit may be dismissed, as infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect in the plaint as follows:- "Since the suit picture had already been released, the relief in the suit had become infructuous. Hence, the suit may be

dismissed, as infructuous."

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

Srcm In view of the same, recording the endorsement, this suit is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

31.01.2017 Srcm CS.No.234 of 2010 http://www.judis.nic.in