N.Munusamy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.09.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.NO.39697 OF 2016 N.Munusamy

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

4. Mr.Senthil, Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Superintendent of Police Office, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate appropriate action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 21.10.2016 and give protection to the petitioner from the harassment of respondent - 4. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondents - 1 to 3 :

Mr.G.Krishnaraja, Government Counsel Respondent - 4 :

Mr.Sanmuga Sundaran https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought by the petitioner has become infructuous and therefore, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrr To

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.47239 W.P.No.39697 of 2016 CP(CO) CS/12/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/