A.Poobalan, v. The State Bank Of India,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.7363 of 2011 A.Poobalan .... Petitioner

Versus

The State Bank of India, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Walajapet Branch, Vellore District.

... Respondent Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to sanction a sum of Rs.1,60,000/- to the petitioner towards the petitioner's son educational loan on the basis of the petitioner's son application dated 15.12.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Somasekar For Respondents :Mr.R.Vigneshwaran for M/s.Kavitha Audikesavalu

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following relief:

''To issue a Mandamus directing the respondent to sanction a sum of Rs.1,60,000/- to the petitioner towards the petitioner's son's educational loan on the basis of the petitioner's son application dated 15.12.2010.''

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, during the pendency of the writ petition, the educational loan has been sanctioned and therefore, the prayer as sought for in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In view of the subsequent development during the pendency of the writ petition, nothing survives for consideration. Therefore, the writ petition is closed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kal To The Branch Manager State Bank of India, Walajapet Branch, Vellore District.

+1 cc to Mr.R.Vigneswaran Advocate sr 12726 W.P.No.7363 of 2011 rj(co) aa13/03/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/