B.Saravanan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.07.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN B.Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented By its Additional Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Director General of Police, Office of Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.
3.The District Collector, Office of Collectorate, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.
4.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu,
5.The Inspector of Police, Thirukalukundram Police Station, Thirukalukundram, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider my representation dated 29.09.2020 and consequently directing the fourth respondent to provide police protection to me and my family members and pass suitable orders. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
This petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider my representation dated 29.09.2020 and consequently directing the fourth respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner submitted a representation to the respondents on 29.09.2020 seeking appropriate departmental action as against the fifth respondent
herein. The petitioner is an accused in Crime No.931 of 2020. Only to escape from the clutches of law, the petitioner submitted a representation to take appropriate action as against the fifth respondent.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner has encroached the Poramboke land and as such a case has been registered against him in Crime No.931 of 2020. Now, the fifth respondent also transferred to some other police station. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition cannot be considered.
4. Therefore, this petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 08.07.2022 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order cda/mn
To 1.The Additional Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Director General of Police, Office of Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.
3.The District Collector, Office of Collectorate, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.
4.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu, 5.The Inspector of Police, Thirukalukundram Police Station, Thirukalukundram,
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
mn 08.07.2022