G.Rajalakshmi v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourth day of July Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15306 of 2022 G.RAJALAKSHMI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-2, KODAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CRIME NO.81/2022) For Petitioner : M/S K.R.GUNASHEKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.DAMODARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor, PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.03.2022 at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(a), 22(c), 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Sections 465, 468, 472 of IPC in Crime No.81 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 17.03.2022 at about 9.00 a.m. when one of the accused was selling banned drugs at Kodambakkam Trustpuram Play Ground, the respondent/police arrested the accused and recovered 250 banned drug pills. Based on the information from that accused, the petitioner/A1 and other accused were arrested. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are totally six accused involved in the alleged offence, wherein the petitioner has been arrayed as A1. He would further submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and a false case has been foisted against her. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of Nitravet - 10 mg (150 tablets) and Tydol-100 mg (100 tablets). Though, they possessed separately of certain quantities, in total, all possessed contraband are commercial quantity. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the serious nature of offence committed by petitioner and this Court had dismissed the earlier application filed by the petitioner and that there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 04/07/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-2, KODAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI.

CC to M/S K.R.GUNASHEKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15306/2022 Date :04/07/2022 TA-08/07/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/