Vadivel v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.14148 of 2021 1 VADIVEL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 MARIYAPPAN @ MANIVEL 3 SAKTHIVEL Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADATHUR POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.34/2021).

For Petitioner : M/S.E.SATHIYARAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 364 and 302 of I.P.C. r/w.147, 364, 302 & 201 of I.P.C. in Crime No.34 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 16.01.2021, when the deceased, namely, Logidoss @ Muniyappan was standing in Puthureddiur Road, a Car driven by A1 was came in a rash and negligent manner along with A2 to A4. Hence, the deceased questioned A1 to A4. Immediately, the accused kidnapped the deceased and went to Muthanur Village and all the accused have attacked the deceased. As a result, the deceased got grievous injuries and died in his house after narrating the entire facts to his wife. Hence, the wife of the deceased lodged a complaint before the respondent police.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hence, the learned counsel prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners were brutally attacked the defacto complainant's husband and caused grievous injuries to him. Due to which, the defacto complainant's husband died. Hence, he vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the gravity of offence committed by the accused persons, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 12/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADATHUR POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to M/S.E.SATHIYARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.8590 CRL OP.14148/2021 Date :12/08/2021 CSK 23/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/