Madeswaran v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 19.09.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2013 Madeswaran

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Madhikonpalayam Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

(Crime No.391 of 2011)

2. Ramasamy

3. Balamurugan

4. Senthilkumar

5. Ramayee

6. Geetha

7. Govindan

8. Kaveri

9. Subramani

10. Perumal 11.Ammasi

...Respondents

This Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the judgment dated 19.03.2013 passed in C.C.No.110 of 2011 by the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Dharmapuri (Incharge). For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.G.J.Baskar Narayanan for RR2 to 11

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. On a perusal of the order impugned in this revision, it reveal that as per amendment dated 31.12.2009, appeal only lies against the impugned order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hence this criminal revision is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate forum, if he advised so. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cgi To

1. The Judicial Magistrate I, Dharmapuri.

2. Do - through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dharmapuri.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2013 GMY(10/10/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/