V.Purushothaman, v. The Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.10.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.33542 to 33546 of 2015 V.Purushothaman S/o.Varadagoundar No.949B Pasumponnagar Kilpudupakkam Extenstion Cheyyar Taluk Cheyyar 604407 Thiruvannamalai Dt. ...PETITIONER IN W.P.No.33542/2015 P.Rajasekar S/o.Punniyakotti Old No.4/43 New No.306 2nd Main Road Anna Nagar Cheyyar 604407 Thiruvannamalai Dt.

... PETITIONER IN W.P.No.33543/2015 S.Manjula W/o.K.Sakthivel No.599 Velmuruga Street Cheyyar 604407 Thiruvannamalai Dt.

...PETITIONER IN W.P.No.33544/2015 K.Mannar Karuppagounder No.132 Kullakarai Street Vakkadai Village and Post Cheyyar Taluk Thiruvannamalai 604409.

...PETITIONER IN W.P.No.33545/2015 T.Kamarasan S/o.T.P.Thiruchitrampalam No.177 Gandi Street, Cheyyar 604407, Thiruvannamalai Dt.

...PETITIONER IN W.P.No.33546/2015 Vs.

1 The Collector The District Collector Office, Thiruvannamalai District. 2 The Tahsildhar Cheyyar Taluk Office Cheyyar.

...RESPONDENTS IN ALL W.Ps.

Writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider the representations of the petitioners, dt.09.09.2014 and 2.11.2014 respectively and to dispose the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Mohanasundaram for in all W.Ps. M/s.M.S.Associates For Respondents : Mr.S.Diwakar, A.G.P.

O R D E R

The petitioners have made representation, dated 9.9.2014 and 2.11.2014 to the first respondent seeking creation of pathway to reach their residence. On the said request, the second respondent has conducted an enquiry and in pursuant to the same, it was stated that only on the petitioner producing relevant documents such as parent documents, encumbrance certificate, appropriate action would be taken.

2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievance of the petitioners is that creation of pathway to reach his house.

Therefore, the second respondent has misdirected the same by treating the request made as one for change of patta.

3 This Court is not willing to go into the issues on fact. Petitioner ought to have approached the second respondent instead of the first respondent at the first instance. Be that as it may. Liberty is given to the petitioners to give fresh representations to the respondent No.2 seeking creation of the road to reach their houses. On such request being made, the second respondent shall pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is well open to the respondent No.2 to seek documents as he requires from the petitioners which the petitioners are duty bound to supply.

The Writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To 1 The Collector The District Collector Office, Thiruvannamalai District. 2 The Tahsildhar Cheyyar Taluk Office Cheyyar.

+5 ccs to Mr.M.S.Associates,Advocate(sr.57378) W.P.No.33542 to 33546 of 2015 sk(co) cp 30/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/