Madras High CourtWP/33590/2015disposed of

T.Subramanian v. The Principal Secretary

2015-10-16Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan3 pages

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 16.10.2015 Coram The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Writ Petition No.33590 of 2015 T.Subramanian .... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Executive Engineer, Lower Bhavani LBP Division, Water Resource Organisation, Public Works Department, Erode - 2.

3. The Executive Engineer, Ground Water Division (PWD), Asthampatty, Salem - 7.

4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, LBP Sub Division - 2, Water Resource Organisation, Erode.

5. The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury Office, Erode.

.... Respondents PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth and fifth respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2015 to accept the petitioner's Bill War particular approved by the third respondent on 23.04.2015 and pay all the revision of pension and connected arrears within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sreedharan For Respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran, G.A.

----------

O R D E R

By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner has retired from the services of the Water Resource Organisation of Public Works Department as Work Inspector - Grade I and he is drawing pension. The petitioner claims to have rendered 33 years of service. The petitioner would state that as per G.O.Ms.No.304 of Finance Department dated 28.03.1990, the scale of pay of Rs.1400-2300-60-2600 for selection grade for those who are on the ordinary grade of Rs.1200-2040 has been provided and so also in respect of categories of employees in the post on the ordinary grade of pre-revised scale of Rs.780-1385 and Rs.905-1545, corresponding selection grade to Rs.1045-1775 prior to 27.06.1989.

3. The petitioner has now expressed his grievance that his Bill War particulars as well as revision of pension have not been given to him in spite of repeated representations, the last of such representation was submitted on 06.07.2015 to the first respondent and since no orders have been passed, he came forward to file this Writ Petition.

4. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Gunasekaran, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

5. Though the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this Court in the light of the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the same, permits the petitioner to submit one more representation to respondents 1 to 5 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and respondents 2 to 5, on receipt of such representation, are directed to consider the same and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of ten weeks thereafter and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. sl s/d- Assistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar