← Library
Madras High CourtWP/33712/2015disposed of

Mrs.A.Shanthi v. Accountant General Ii

2015-10-26Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE: 26.10.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.33712/2015 Mrs.A.Shanthi .. Petitioner

Versus

1.The Accountant General-II Teynampet, Chennai-17.

2.The District Educational Officer Tirupur Educational District, Tirupur.

3.The Bishop CSI Trichy-Tanjore Diocese Diocesan Office, Puthur, Tiruchirappalli-620017. 4.The Correspondent CSI Boys Higher Secondary School Ellis Nagar, Dharapuram, Tirupur District.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to claim and disburse the General Provident Fund amount to the petitioner for the period from 19.12.1996 to 20.11.2012.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Immanuel For R1 : Mr.V.Vijayshankar For R2 : Mr.V.Subbiah, Spl.GP

ORDER

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

The service record of the petitioner is as follows:-

Schools Worked Period From To Findlay Higher Secondary School, Mannargudi 19.12.1996 07.06.1988 St.Peter's Higher Secondary School, Thanjavur 08.06.1988 31.06.2001 Findlay Higher Secondary school, Mannargudi 01.07.2001 07.06.2008 CSI Boys Higher Secondary School, Karur 08.06.2008 31.07.2009 CSI Boys Higher Secondary School, Dharapuram 01.08.2009 20.11.2012 Dismissal from service 20.11.2012 The petitioner, challenging the dismissal order dated 20.11.2012, filed WP.No.19482/2015 and the same is pending. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that though she has worked between 19.12.1996 and 20.11.2012 as Secondary Grade Teacher/B.T. Assistant [Tamil Pandit], the General Provident Fund, due and payable to her, have not been settled. In this regard, she has also submitted a representation dated 18.04.

2013 to the 4th respondent and since no orders have been passed, she came forward to file this writ petition. This Court heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Vijayshankar, learned counsel who accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.V.Subbiah, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Though the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this Court, in the light of the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the same, permits the petitioner to submit one more representation by enclosing a copy of this order as well as the copy of the earlier representation dated 18.04.

2013 to the 4th respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the 4th respondent, on receipt of the same, is directed to consider and dispose of the said representation on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a further period of eight weeks thereafter and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner as well as to the 2nd respondent herein.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-V) /TRUE COPY/ SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR AP To 1.The Accountant General-II Teynampet, Chennai-17.

2.The District Educational Officer Tirupur Educational District, Tirupur.

+1 CC to MR. A.Immanual Advocate. SR.NO. 58004 +1 CC to Govt.Pleader. SR.NO. 58038 W.P.No.33712/2015 CO-CA JD 04/11/2015