← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17132/2021dismissed as infructuous

Susheela Choudhary v. Union Of India

2024-04-22Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Nos.17132 & 17137 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.18152 & 18156 of 2021 WP.No.17132 of 2021 Susheela Choudhary ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Union of India Represented by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs, ... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent relating to the impugned order dated 13.12.2019 uploaded in the website of the first respondent insofar as the petitioner 1/6

herein vide DIN:0818718, is concerned, quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merit and consequentially direct the respondents herein to permit petitioner to get reappointed as Director of any Company or appointed as Director in any company without any hindrance. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.Sathish Rajan, Central Government Standing Counsel WP.No.17137 of 2021 Ajay Choudhary ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Union of India Represented by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs, ... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent relating to the impugned order dated 13.12.2019 2/6

uploaded in the website of the first respondent insofar as the petitioner herein vide DIN:6593724, is concerned, quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merit and consequentially direct the respondents herein to permit petitioner to get reappointed as Director of any Company or appointed as Director in any company without any hindrance. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.Sathish Rajan, Central Government Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER Both the writ petitions have been filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 13.12.2019.

2.

The learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the prayer sought for in these writ petitions have become infructuous. 3.

In view of the above submission, both the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3/6

22.04.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok To 1.Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Union of India 4/6

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok 5/6

22.04.2024 6/6