P.Manohar v. The Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.40372 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.34444 of 2016 P.Manohar Petitioner

Versus

1. The Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Spencers Complex, Chennai.

2. Bank of Baroda, Anna Nagar Branch, Y-223, 6th Main Road, Off. 2nd Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

rep. by its Senior Branch Manager,

3. K.Poopathy Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondents, particularly that of the 1st respondent in I.A.No.427 of 2016 in SA SR No.2754 of 2008 dated 28.10.2016 and quash the same as illegal and unlawful and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to take on file the above SA SR No.2754 of 2008 to hear and dispose the same on merits.

For petitioner : Mr.T.S.Rajamohan For R2 : Mr.S.Namasivayam

ORDER

(Order of the court was made by Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the loan account with the Respondent-Bank had been settled and therefore, the Petitioner does not want to press the present Writ Petition and has made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The learned counsel for the Respondent Bank does not have any objection for the same. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VII) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar ssk.

To:

1. The Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Spencers Complex, Chennai.

W.P.No.40372 of 2016 aa07/01/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/