← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2960/2017disposed of

A.M.S.Ramasoowami, v. The Inspector General Of

2017-11-13Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.2960 of 2017

1. A.M.S.Ramasoowami

2. R.Palanisamy ... Petitioners vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100-Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai - 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, Office of District Registrar, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

3. The Joint No.1, Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar office, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to register the sale deed dated 30.09.2016 which was presented by the petitioners for registration and release the sale deed within time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioners : Ms.P.T.Asha for M/s.Sarvabhauman Association.

For Respondents : Mr.A.Kumar, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioners seek for a Mandamus to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to register the sale deed dated 30.09.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. It appears that the petitioners presented the sale deed dated 30.09.2016 before the 3rd respondent on 03.10.2016 for registering the same. It is stated that the 3rd respondent has neither registered the document nor returned the same with any endorsement so far and therefore, the petitioners have approached this Court and filed the present writ petition with the relief as stated supra.

4. Needless to say that once the document is presented, the 3rd respondent has to proceed with in accordance with law and decide as to whether the same is required to be registered or to be returned if it is found that there is some legal impediment for registering the same by the 3rd respondent. It appears that the 3rd respondent has not done either of the above said two actions. On the other hand, it is stated, the 3rd respondent is keeping quite all these days.

5. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of only with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the sale deed dated 30.09.2016 presented by the petitioner on 03.10.2016 and take appropriate action on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar vsi To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100-Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai - 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, Office of District Registrar, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

3. The Joint No.1, Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar office, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

+1 C.C. to M/s.Sarvabhauman Association. Advocate SR.No. 80360, DT.14.11.2017 +1 C.C. to The Special Government Pleader SR.No. 80504, DT.14.11.2017 W.P.No.2960 of 2017 T.R (16/11/2017)