← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19395/2017disposed of

P.S.Sridhar v. Inspector Of General

2017-07-28Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.07.2017

CORAM

The Honourable MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.Nos.19395 and 19396 of 2017 P.S.Sridhar Petitioner in both the WPS Vs

1. Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 28.

2. The District Registrar (Administration) District Registrar Office, Chennai (South) No.9, Jeenis Road, II Floor, Saidapet, Chennai 15.

3. The Sub Registrar, Neelangkarai, Kanchaipuram District.

4. P.G.Lakshminarayan Respondents in both the Wps Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein to dispose the representations dated 0.07.2017 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Saravanakumar For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai,AGP

ORDER

Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent, the main writ petitions are taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petitions to issue writs of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the representations dated 10.07.2017, in accordance with law.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representations dated 10.07.2017, the 2nd respondent has not disposed of the same yet.

4. Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representations dated 10.07.2017, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 4th respondent.

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 10.07.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to the 4th respondent.

With this observation, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rg To

1. Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 28.

2. The District Registrar (Administration) District Registrar Office, Chennai (South) No.9, Jeenis Road, II Floor, Saidapet, Chennai 15.

3. The Sub Registrar, Neelangkarai, Kanchaipuram District.

+2cc to MR.J.SaravanaKumar, Advocate SR.No.53688 +1cc to the Government Pleader SR.No.54417 +2cc to MR.J.SaravanaKumar, Advocate SR.No.53689(02.08.2017) W.P.Nos.19395 and 19396 of 2017 GJ(CO) GN(02/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/