Madras High CourtCRP/3323/2009dismissed as infructuous

Canara Bank v. Rp Gnanamani

2017-01-12Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.01.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN C.R.P.(PD).No.3323 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 Canara Bank Rep by its Branch Manager, Park Town Branch, Chennai - 600 003.

.. Petitioner Vs 1.R.P.Gnanamani 2.Maruthapandian 3.S.Jayaraj .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.7014 of 2009 in O.S.No.1401 of 2007 dated 25.08.2009 on the file of XVIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai and allow the above C.R.P For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bharadwaj For Respondents : M/s.A.R.Anand for R1

M.V.MURALIDARAN.J., ub

O R D E R

It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 12.01.2017 ub Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To The XVIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.

C.R.P.(NPD).No.3323 of 2009 http://www.judis.nic.in