← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/16054/2020dismissed

Ramesh @ Vasanthakumar v. State Rep.By

2020-10-22Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.10.2020

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.16054 of 2020 Ramesh @ VasanthaKumar ... Petitioner/Accused(A1) Vs.

State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Gengavalli Police Station, Salem District.

Crime No.315 of 2020.

... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest in Crime No.315 of 2020 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sasikumar For Respondent : Mr.Charles Prem Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 364(A) of IPC in Crime No.315 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is a case of kidnapping for ransom and this petitioner is absconding since the date of occurrence. As per the First Information Report, one Ramesh, Prabhu and Manoj have called the de-facto complainant over phone and informed her that they have kidnapped her husband and demanded an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and if not given, they will kill her husband. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that based of the information the police has taken action against the accused persons. Further, he would submit that they have arrested A2 to A4, this petitioner, who is A1, the brain behind the crime. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side and also considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 22/10/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GENGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.16054/2020 Date :22/10/2020 cs 03/11/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/