The Commissioner Of Income v. M/S.East Coast Terminal

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 10.10.2018 Coram :

The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.65 & 67 of 2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai ...Appellant/Appellate Vs M/s.East Coast Terminal Operations & Port Services Ltd., Chennai-6.

...Respondent/Respondent

APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order dated 26.9.2013 in ITA Nos.562 and 564/Mds/2013 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench respectively for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2007-08.

For Appellant :

Mr.Karthik Ranganathan For Respondent :

Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. These appeals by the Revenue challenge the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue in favour of the assessee.

3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeals on account of low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are left open. In the event, in each of the cases, the tax effect is above the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench. Copy To: The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Advocate Sr.No.70647 +1 cc to Ms.G.Susheela, Advocate Sr.No.70391 TCA.Nos.65 & 67 of 2016 CSL/07.12.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/