S.Santhanam, v. The State Rep. By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 9.3.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Crl.O.P. No.5689 of 2015

1. S. Santhanam

2. Yuvaraj .. Petitioners Vs.

The State, represented by its Inspector of Police, Guduvancheri, Kancheepuram District .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C., to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners by the learned Principal Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu in Crl.M.P.No.445 of 2015 dagted 23.2.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.P.S.Amalraj For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Govt. Advocate (crl.side)

O R D E R

Petition for modification of the bail condition.

2. The learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chengleput was pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner imposing certain conditions. Now, the petitioners moved this Court to relax the said condition imposed by the said Judge.

3. Actually, the petitioners have by-passed the learned Sessions Judge and they did not care the Sessions Judge. They have over looked the Sessions Judge. Therefore, they will approach the learned Sessions Judge and appraise him of the latest situation and seek the relief. If they were successful there, let they go happily, if they were unsuccessful, the doors of this court are always open to decide the matter on merits.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. With this liberty, the petition is disposed of . Sd/- Asst. Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar.

Msr To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge of Kancheepuram District, Chengalpattu

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police, Guduvancheri, Kancheepuram District + 1 CC to M/s.P.S.Amalraj, Advocate sr no 13474 Crl.O.P. No.5689 of 2015 ppa[co] gp/25.3.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/