Muruganandam v. The State Rep By,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.10.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL.O.P.No.16131 of 2020 1.Muruganandam 2.Manimalar 3.Chandrasekaran ... Petitioners Vs.
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, CSCID Unit, Ambattur, Chennai District.
(Crime No.226 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.226 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.U.Kathiravan For Respondent : Mr.M. Mohammed Riaz Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order, 1982 r/w. Section 7(1)(a) (ii) of EC Act, 1955 in Crime No.226 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found to be illegally transporting PDS rice without any valid licence or permit. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent person and they have been falsely implicated in this case. However, on instruction, they would further submit that taking into consideration of the Covid pandemic situation, the petitioners without prejudice to their defence, are prepared to make considerable donation to any Charitable Organization or Association.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners were in possession of rice without any valid licence. He would further submit that the there are no previous cases pending against the petitioners. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5.In order to curb the illegal activities, this Court is of the opinion that each of the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to "The Commissioner of Corporation, Chennai, for the purpose of "Amma Unavagam" without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court.
6.Merely, because the petitioners deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of her guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently. 7.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions :- [a] Each of the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of "The Commissioner of Corporation, Chennai, for the purpose of "Amma Unavagam" within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Thereafter, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance and on production of proof of payment of the above amount the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thiruvallur, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every Monday and Friday at 10.30 am until further orders. [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
-sd/- 12/10/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, THIRUVALLUR.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CSCID UNIT, AMBATTUR, CHENNAI DISTRICT.
5 THE COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATION, CHENNAI, FOR THE PURPOSE OF "AMMA UNAVAGAM".
CC to M/S.U.KATHIRAVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.16131/2020 Date :12/10/2020 cs 28/10/2020